SYSTEM WARNING: 'date_default_timezone_get(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.' in '/usr/share/mantis/www/core.php' line 264

0002281: unmatched traffic seems exclusive - MantisBT
MantisBT - Endian Firewall
View Issue Details
0002281Endian FirewallQoSpublic2009-10-20 14:262010-09-24 16:13
luca-endian 
peter-endian 
normalmajoralways
acknowledgedopen 
 
future 
0002281: unmatched traffic seems exclusive
I show an example which is easiest.

QoS enabled, there is no rules.
While I download an iso at the maximum bandwidth I've terrible latency in a normal ssh session between the same client and the firwall.

This effect has been noticed in a normal network usage too between two different clients.
No tags attached.
related to 0002414acknowledged  QoS not always working 
child of 0003045confirmed peter-endian TODO: QoS rework - QoS collecting ticket 
Issue History
2009-10-20 14:26luca-endianNew Issue
2009-10-20 18:43peter-endianNote Added: 0003130
2009-10-20 18:43peter-endianStatusnew => acknowledged
2009-10-27 13:56peter-endianProjectEnterprise => Endian Firewall
2009-11-25 12:25peter-endianRelationship addedrelated to 0002414
2009-11-25 12:25peter-endianNote Added: 0003373
2009-11-25 12:25peter-endianAssigned To => peter-endian
2009-11-25 12:25peter-endianStatusacknowledged => assigned
2009-11-25 17:49peter-endianTarget Version => 2.3.1
2010-03-03 15:25ra-endianTarget Version2.3.1 => future
2010-09-21 18:11peter-endianRelationship addedchild of 0003045
2010-09-21 18:11peter-endianStatusassigned => acknowledged
2010-09-24 16:13peter-endianCategoryOther Services => QoS
2010-09-24 16:13peter-endianProduct Versionenterprise-2.3-rc1 =>

Notes
(0003130)
peter-endian   
2009-10-20 18:43   
probably due to the fact that there's currently no ingress limiting
(0003373)
peter-endian   
2009-11-25 12:25   
needs only deploy