SYSTEM WARNING: 'date_default_timezone_get(): It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected the timezone 'UTC' for now, but please set date.timezone to select your timezone.' in '/usr/share/mantis/www/core.php' line 264

0002414: QoS not always working - MantisBT
MantisBT - Endian Firewall
View Issue Details
0002414Endian FirewallQoSpublic2009-11-13 09:172010-09-23 16:16
aender 
 
normalmajorrandom
acknowledgedopen 
2.3 
 
0002414: QoS not always working
I have the rules in the attachment that should do the following.

1. High Priority for Citrix through my IPSec tunnel (local to head office)
2. Medium Priority for Citrix Printers through my IPSec tunnel (from head office to local)
3. Low Priority (Bluk Traffic) for the rest who goes to RED.

Now sometimes, not at all, it could happens that my citrix session are very slow while a download from internet. First and Third Rule should prevent this!
No tags attached.
related to 0002281acknowledged peter-endian unmatched traffic seems exclusive 
child of 0003045confirmed peter-endian TODO: QoS rework - QoS collecting ticket 
png Bildschirmfoto 2009-11-13 um 10.13.03.png (33,718) 2009-11-13 09:17
https://bugs.endian.com/file_download.php?file_id=304&type=bug
png
Issue History
2009-11-13 09:17aenderNew Issue
2009-11-13 09:17aenderFile Added: Bildschirmfoto 2009-11-13 um 10.13.03.png
2009-11-25 12:25peter-endianRelationship addedrelated to 0002281
2009-11-25 12:32peter-endianNote Added: 0003375
2009-11-25 12:32peter-endianStatusnew => feedback
2009-11-25 12:49aenderNote Added: 0003376
2009-11-25 14:00peter-endianNote Added: 0003377
2009-11-25 15:07aenderNote Added: 0003382
2010-07-05 16:37peter-endianRelationship addedchild of 0003045
2010-09-20 17:24peter-endianCategoryNetwork related (VPN, uplinks) => QoS
2010-09-23 16:16peter-endianStatusfeedback => acknowledged

Notes
(0003375)
peter-endian   
2009-11-25 12:32   
first of all, it is necessary to prioritize also the ipsec tunnel itself.
This rule prioritizes only the printer traffic within the tunnel, but if the uplink is saturated the printer has no priority above the rest of the traffic outside of the tunnel.

Rest maybe fixed with resolution of 0002281
(0003376)
aender   
2009-11-25 12:49   
ähhmm

Maybe i´m to stupid to understand that correctly.
Can you explain me that in german?
(0003377)
peter-endian   
2009-11-25 14:00   
um traffic im ipsec tunnel zu priorisieren muss der ipsec tunnel selber auch priorisiert sein.
wenn der uplink durch irgendwelchen anderen traffic zugemüllt wird, sodass der ipsec tunnel zu wenig bandbreite kriegt hilft die priorisierung innerhalb des tunnels nichts.
priorisierung innerhalb des ipsec tunnels priorisiert nur im hinblick auf anderen traffic der im selben tunnel anfällt.
(0003382)
aender   
2009-11-25 15:07   
Thanks a lot.
Now its clear.

I will try it and give you a response